Most organisations vet contractors; far fewer have a vetting process. The difference shows under pressure: when the appointment is urgent, when the person who 'usually handles it' is away, or when an incident review asks why a business was appointed. A process makes the checks consistent, delegable and defensible.
1. Define the criteria once
Write down what a contractor must evidence to work for you — insurance levels, competence signals per trade, health and safety documentation, references and business standing. The standard vetting layers are the starting frame; your property types and risk appetite set the levels. Criteria that live in someone's head are not criteria, they are habits.
2. Tier by risk
One-size vetting either burdens small appointments or under-checks big ones. Most organisations settle on tiers along these lines:
- Baseline — every contractor: insurance, core competence evidence, basic H&S documentation
- Standard — recurring and higher-value work: adds references, financial checks, fuller H&S review
- Enhanced — compliance-critical and high-risk work: adds specific certification verification, job-level RAMS review, and tighter ongoing monitoring
3. Build the workflow
- A standard request pack — the same document list sent to every candidate
- Named ownership — who reviews, who approves, who can waive (and must record why)
- A decision record — approved, declined or conditional, with date and criteria version
- An onboarding step — terms, documentation expectations and a contained first job
4. Keep records that would survive scrutiny
Store certificates, checks and decisions per contractor, with expiry dates driving renewal chases. The test is simple: could someone reconstruct why this business was approved, from the file alone, two years later? If not, the process exists only socially.
5. Review on a cycle
Re-vet on document expiry and review performance annually — attendance reliability, documentation quality, pricing drift, incidents. Feed the results back: contractors who slip get conditions or removal; criteria that let a bad appointment through get tightened. A static process ages as fast as a static approved list.
Using pre-vetted supply
A defined process also makes it obvious where external filtering helps. Regency Contractors Network reviews contractors before listing and presents structured profiles — credentials, services, coverage — so your process starts from organised candidates instead of cold search results. Clients keep their own criteria and decision; the network compresses the funnel that feeds it. See how it works for client organisations.
Frequently asked questions
- Who should own contractor vetting in an organisation?
- One named function — often FM, procurement or compliance — owning the criteria and records, even where multiple teams appoint contractors. Distributed appointing works; distributed criteria do not.
- Should existing long-standing contractors go through the process?
- Yes, on a sensible timetable. Long relationships are valuable, but they are exactly where expired insurance and outdated assumptions hide.





